Paul Kagame: a major threat, and in very short-term, to peace in Africa
Paul Kagame: a major threat, and in very short-term, to peace in Africa
"Rwandophones"? A
semantic clarification:
Lately when Paul Kagame speaks
of "Rwandophones", he really means Tutsis only and not all speakers
of Kinyarwanda. This is to try to get out of the contradiction raised by his
decree announcing that the Hutu, Tutsi, and Twa ethnic groups do not exist in
Rwanda or elsewhere, and at the same time to continue to say that he is on a
crusade to defend the interests of the Tutsis everywhere in the region as he
has been singing since 1990-94 when he conquered Rwanda. His advisors have
therefore convinced him to change the designation and to speak of
"Rwandophones" instead of "Tutsis". But, by doing so, he
makes the mission he has set himself, namely "to defend Rwandophones
everywhere in the world", more ridiculous and even more dangerous as we
shall see.
It is therefore necessary to
read and understand in the term "Rwandophones" coming from the mouth
or the pen of Kagame, the "Tutsis".
Comparisons:
To show the absurdity and the
harmfulness of this diabolical mission of Kagame to defend the
"Rwandophones", we are going to show how this is not possible by
going through all the continents and by showing where this principle would
lead!
-In the Middle East
It is as if Saudi Arabia would
justify its military intervention in Yemen by saying that it is going there to
defend the threatened "Arabic-speaking" minority, even though all
Yemenis speak Arabic and are therefore Arabic-speaking. Ridiculous.
-In Europe
It is as if the Netherlands
would intervene in the North of Belgium under the pretext of going there to
defend the threatened "Dutch-speaking" minority, even though all the
inhabitants of the North of Belgium are Dutch-speaking. Ridiculous.
-In Africa
It is as if Kenya would
intervene militarily in Northern Tanzania under the pretext of defending the
threatened "Swahili-speaking" minority, even though the inhabitants
of Northern Tanzania are all Swahili-speaking. Ridiculous.
-In Latin America
It is as if Colombia invaded
Venezuela under the pretext of defending the threatened "Spanish-speaking"
minority, even though all Venezuelans are Spanish-speaking. Ridiculous.
-In Asia
It is as if one of the two
Koreas invaded the other under the pretext of going there to defend the
"Korean-speaking" minority, even though all the inhabitants of the
two Koreas speak Korean and are therefore Korean-speaking. Ridiculous.
Although this pretext for
invading other countries is ridiculous and even laughable throughout the world,
as we have just shown schematically, Paul Kagame, the spoiled child of the
West, continues to use and abuse it without anyone daring to contradict him or
prevent him from doing so.
On his record, we will briefly
note his threats and sometimes their execution with impunity.
Threats and execution in
neighboring countries:
-Tanzania
About ten years ago, Tanzania,
one of the states that sponsored Kagame in his conquest of Rwanda, wanted to
regularize the situation of foreigners living in that country. And among them,
some Rwandan Tutsis had been living there for decades without being registered
as refugees and without having wanted to acquire nationality. And when Tanzania
ordered their expulsion to Rwanda, Paul Kagame threatened to intervene militarily,
if necessary, under the pretext of defending them because, according to him,
they were being persecuted because they were Tutsis.
-Uganda
Even Uganda, his first
homeland, where he was a military officer before his commander-in-chief
Museveni placed him at the head of Rwanda in 1994, does not escape his threats
and even retaliatory measures when a Tutsi is worried even by the justice
system in Uganda.
Less than three years ago,
Paul Kagame closed all of Rwanda's borders with Uganda and ordered his army to
shoot anyone (Rwandan or Ugandan) trying to enter or leave his country. Dozens
of people were killed. The reason for this was to protest the dismissal of some
senior members of the Ugandan army, police, and security services. These were
in fact Rwandan Tutsis whom Kagame had allowed to stay in Uganda in order to
infiltrate these services. And when Uganda began to dismantle this network,
Paul Kagame brandished "persecution of the Tutsis" and reacted as we
have just seen. To defuse the crisis, it took the intervention of Museveni's
son, his declared successor, General Muhoozi Kainerugaba, who has since
proclaimed that Kagame, as a Tutsi, is his uncle and that with him they must
dominate the other peoples of the region.
-Burundi
Burundi is considered the
weakest link in the chain and where Kagame only dreams of establishing his
order. Indeed, Paul Kagame considers that the Burundians are "Rwandophones"
and that as such he has the right to intervene militarily at any time to impose
his order there, that is, the Tutsi hegemony.
No matter how much we explain
to him that Burundi has already resolved the ethnic question (Hutu, Tutsi, and
Twa), he still does not want to admit it and continues his attempts at
destabilization since 1993-94 when he assassinated or masterminded the
assassination of two Burundian presidents within six months: Melchior Ndadaye
in October 1993 and Cyprien Ntaryamira in April 1994. His last attempt of a
military putsch was in May 2015 and even though it failed, he has not abandoned
the project of going to "defend the Rwandophones" of Burundi. He is harboring
home-based rebellions like Red Tabara and others.
-DRC
Kagame’s favorite field of
maneuver to "defend the Rwandophones" is obviously the Democratic
Republic of Congo (DRC). Since the end of 2021, he has been on his Nth exercise
and it seems to be succeeding because under the same pretext of "defending
the Rwandophones", he has just conquered territories larger than his tiny and
overpopulated Rwanda. However, the "Rwandophones" he brandishes (a
few Congolese Tutsis led by Rwandan Tutsis, his army), remain a minority in
North Kivu while the Hutu and other Bantu populations, the true Rwandophones,
that he is supposed to come and liberate, flee his M23 like the plague.
But alas! this macabre game of
Paul Kagame is not denounced by any international authority. On the contrary,
it is supported and encouraged underhandedly.
Risk of armed interventions in
all countries inhabited or having welcomed Rwandans:
Since his conquest of Rwanda
in 1994, Paul Kagame, surely on the advice of his Anglo-Saxon creators and
masters to which has been added the France of Sarkozy and Macron, has been
conducting a foreign policy that allows him to intervene whenever he wants in
certain African states.
Some African states have
always welcomed Tutsis and still have them among their populations. Other
states that have welcomed Hutu refugees since 1994 have seen Tutsis sent by
Kagame settle there as "businessmen, new landowners, security agents,
linked by marriage to nationals, etc."; but all with the mission to
monitor and if necessary, to make life hard for Hutu refugees in these
countries.
Having thus constituted a
visible Tutsi community in these countries, Paul Kagame can at any time evoke
his "right to go and protect the Rwandophones" by invading or by
carrying out military actions there. These countries are, but to varying
degrees, Kenya, Congo-Brazza, Central African Republic, Gabon, Nigeria, Benin,
Zambia, Malawi, South Africa, and Mozambique.
The result would be (or surely
will be) conflagration and chaos on the entire continent caused by one man:
Paul Kagame.
How can we avert this risk of
misfortune, which would come on top of the other disasters (natural or man-made)
that have hit the black continent?
The answer to this question is
simple and obvious. But alas! those who must provide it remain insensitive and
mute.
Indeed, it is sufficient that
the powers that guarantee impunity and untouchability to the Tutsi dictator
Paul Kagame tell him that "enough is enough" and that he must no
longer use the Tutsi community, which is wrongly considered as superior to
others and created to dominate them, destabilize countries and soon the entire
black continent.
Who would dare to tell him
this and whom he would likely listen to and comply?
And what can do the African states and their peoples threatened by this fantasy
of Kagame aimed at invading them under the pretext of "defending the
Rwandophones" of their countries?
posted by Mamadou Kouyate @ 9:28 PM
0 Comments
