Hungry for Truth, Peace and Justice

Did you know? The Apartheid system is raging in the Great Lakes region of Africa under the patronage of Museveni and his Western Masters.

Racism, or any form of segregation or discrimination, is a disease that will affect humanity until the end of time. There is not a single country in the world that does not experience a high or moderate level of racism or segregation. Even today, we can safely say that the situation remains the same. There is no country in the world without implicit or explicit segregation. Even the smallest state in the world, which I will not name, is still racist. But so far, two countries have been the only ones in history to openly and shamelessly include racism in their written laws. These countries are the United States of America (USA) and South Africa (RSA).

However, these cursed laws could not remain in force, because African Americans, Black South Africans and other oppressed races rose up against them, they fought by denouncing and using all means of self-defense at their disposal, until these cruel, shameful and despicable laws were repealed. For example, this movement of legitimate and courageous protest took place in America where Martin Luther King played such an important role that the enemies of freedom assassinated him on April 4, 1968. It should be noted that his family is still unhappy with the outcome of the trial that followed this vile and ignoble act.

Furthermore, regarding the abolition of these ungodly laws, some people summarize it in these words: "On July 2, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed Law 115, the first law in history that required the business sector to cease all discrimination in public and private housing, (private) restaurants, hotels and stores, and school workplaces." The enactment of this law was certainly a great step, because the apartheid law was a disgrace to "the Greatest Democracy in the world." Indeed, there is no greater infamy than issuing decrees that discriminate against human beings whom God created with freedom and responsibility.

However, the de jure dissolution of racial discrimination did not prevent it from continuing de facto. Those who claim to be above the law still persist in their extremist actions to this day. However, they forget that, on the one hand, apartheid law humiliated Black victims, but on the other, it exposed the barbarity of the white executioners. This infamous law constituted both a mortal danger for the victims and a disgrace for the executioners.

As for South Africa, in 1992, it was Nelson Mandela who initiated negotiations with the white apartheid government, which had already understood that it was impossible to prevent this change. In 1994, this cruel and brutal regime was de jure defeated when Nelson Mandela was elected to lead a new South Africa that recognized and fought for the rights of Black people and all other peoples of the country. It should be noted that the outcome of the negotiations did not satisfy all South Africans, as fertile land and economically strategic locations remained in the hands of the white minority. 1. What was the policy of white apartheid in South Africa?

Here's what we're told about it:

The system of apartheid was legalized in 1948, but it had been widely practiced long before that year. However, it gained particular traction when the National Party led by Pastor Daniel F. Malan won the presidential election in 1948. From then on, this cursed policy became increasingly powerful, and they gave it the name apartheid. The implementation of apartheid, often referred to as "backward progress" from the 1960s onwards, was made possible by the 1950 Census Act, which classified all South Africans into four classes according to their skin colour: the top class was made up of whites of European descent, the second tier was mulatto (born to one black and one white parent), the third tier was made up of Asians (Indians, Pakistanis) and the last tier was made up of black Africans.

One of the most important laws under the apartheid system was the Groups Act of 1950. It established residential and commercial divisions in cities for each class, and people of other races (Blacks, Asians) were prohibited from engaging in business, labor, or owning land. White groups expelled thousands of people of color, Blacks, and Indians from white-occupied areas. The apartheid system sought to cede 80 percent of South Africa's land to a few whites. To enforce racial segregation and prevent Blacks from entering white areas, the government enforced the Passport Act, which allowed travel from one area to another as if they were two different countries. The "pass" required non-whites to carry documents allowing them to enter restricted areas. After winning the election, Malan's government enacted laws that openly discriminated against individuals based on skin color, creating a state-imposed caste registry.

In 1949, another law banned interracial marriage and criminalized interracial sex.
A law passed in 1951 designated certain urban areas where only whites could live, forcing non-whites to move elsewhere. This law aimed to keep as many Black people as possible in the countryside and to keep them in the lowest poverty class and prevent them from reaching the upper class in the cities. Black residents were also prohibited for any reason from purchasing real estate in the main city districts. Black people were marginalized in every way possible to ensure that the country was systematically dominated by whites.

2. The resurgence of Black unhappiness. Starting in 1954, these cursed laws were further strengthened by Johannes Gerhardus Strijdom, who succeeded Daniel François Malan. Here's how these impious laws were radicalized: Blacks could not be given government positions and could not vote, except in a few elections at the lowest level.

Blacks were forbidden to work and start businesses or to work in areas designated for whites. Anyone who violated this law was to be punished with imprisonment. Furthermore, Blacks could only engage in such activities in areas they called "bantustans," areas of poverty and exclusion reserved for the lowest caste.

Public transportation was provided separately, including trains, buses, planes, and city taxis. Blacks were not allowed to enter areas designated for white residents unless they had a pass issued by the police. Whites also had to carry a pass to enter areas designated for Blacks. This was so that these laws would protect those who defended them from the abuses of those who despised them.

Public buildings, such as the courthouse or the post office, had separate entrances for whites and blacks. Similarly, if people of both races "necessarily" encountered each other in a queue, whites were the first to enter, and their needs were met before blacks.
On July 16, 1976, one of the atrocities committed by apartheid that will not be forgotten in history took place. It was the shooting of the Soweto children who had been protesting since April 30 of that year. When the children threw stones at the police, they responded by firing live ammunition. 566 children were killed by the apartheid police. The protest was specifically provoked by the government's desire that the Afrikaans language of Dutch nationals be used in all schools. The protesting children declared that freedom (independence) is better than school education.

3. Governments Complicit in the White Apartheid System.

The first countries to play a significant role in establishing and maintaining the apartheid system were those with the largest number of settler nationals: these countries were primarily Holland and the United Kingdom. But there were also France, Belgium, Ireland, Portugal, Germany, and Lithuania (whose settler nationals were Jewish). There is no doubt that each of these countries, which had settler nationals, supported apartheid to some extent. But it was primarily the United States of America that supported the apartheid government under the guise of fighting communism. Most, if not all, of the rebel groups that destabilized Africa before 1994 were linked to the apartheid government and its sponsors. It is not surprising that a variant of apartheid took hold in the countries where the rebel groups it formed seized power. The states created through this process did not bring peace to their neighbors. They perpetuated the destabilizing work of the apartheid government, which was always at war with its neighbors. Angola and Mozambique are prime examples of the belligerent work of the apartheid state.

Besides the United States of America, another country that strongly supported apartheid was Israel. This would come as no surprise, as Israel is a right-hand man of the United States of America.

There are also African countries whose leaders refused to separate themselves from their Western masters and agreed to support apartheid even though they denied it. These countries are Mobutu's Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of Congo), Ghana, Malawi, Botswana, Liberia, Madagascar, and Côte d'Ivoire. There are also two Latin American countries that were under US-backed dictatorships that supported apartheid. Chile and Brazil supported the apartheid regime to oppress Black people. On the other hand, Cuba was at the forefront of the fight against apartheid, as it sent troops to Angola, which was the first African country to be continuously at war with the apartheid government. Cuba obviously worked closely with the USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics).

4. After the rain, comes the sunshine. Apartheid law is no longer in effect in South Africa. The Anti-Apartheid Agreement was signed by Frederik de Klerk and Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela. Their negotiations repealed these ungodly laws. These talks began on February 2, 1990. On February 11, 1990, political prisoners were released, including Mandela himself, who had been imprisoned since July 1963 (he had been in prison for almost 27 years!). In 1993, they were able to agree on a draft constitution. On April 27 and 29, 1994, general elections were held with the first participation of Black people as voters and candidates. Nelson Mandela's ANC party won, and Mandela thus became the first president of South Africa without de jure apartheid. But apartheid supporters are still in South Africa, dominating and controlling certain areas of the country that are still de facto off-limits to Black people. They control the country's economy because the negotiations between Mandela and Frederik de Klerk disadvantaged Black people, some of whom believe Mandela misled or even betrayed them by allowing whites to keep all the property they had confiscated from Black people through cannon fire. We hope that in the future this economic system, which left whites with the lion's share, will disappear.

5. Let us ask ourselves some fundamental questions about the current situation of apartheid in Africa.

What does the history of apartheid in South Africa have in common with the history of Rwanda since 1990? Why, when apartheid was ending, did those who supported it attack Rwanda through the Ugandan army, dubbed the RPF Inkotanyi, in this operation? Don't you see that Uganda and defeated Rwanda have inherited the tyrannical and expansionist spirit of South African apartheid to disrupt the peace of their people and their neighbors, indeed of all Africans?

Let us look at some of the similarities between apartheid in South Africa and the government of Rwanda from July 19, 1994 until today:

a. It is a regime established by force of arms with the active participation of Western countries.
b. It is a regime supported by the United States of America and its allies, particularly those in the Western world.

c. It is an unpopular government because it is bloodthirsty, thieving, and destructive.

d. It is a government that classifies people into different categories according to their wealth (this system of ethnic and economic segregation was called "ubudehe").

e. It is a government that gives land to whites and expels blacks with the support of the United States and its allies, who want to send their recalcitrant nationals and illegal immigrants to Rwanda without money or useful studies.

f. It is a regime that does not tolerate those who oppose it and threatens to shoot them, as was the case in Soweto.

g. This is a government that has destroyed homes and farms and created new regions and provinces according to its interests.

h. It is a government that targets a majority of the population so that there are institutions or areas they cannot access. I am talking specifically about the Hutus, but also about the Tutsis who lived in Rwanda before 1994 and who do not collaborate with this bloody regime that the Western Elite uses to exterminate populations they do not want in Africa.

i. It is a government that prioritizes the interests of the white man so that citizens who are not part of its ideological stronghold become foreigners in their own country. These targeted populations have no rights, neither to private property nor to the presumption of innocence, nor to subsistence. They can be stripped of their property and their lives without consequence. It is, in fact, a system of slavery in the guise of a republic.

j. It is an expansionist government always at war, directly or by proxy, against the Black people of Africa under the aegis of the Western Elite. The most targeted by this bloodthirsty regime are the Hutus of Uganda (the Luwero genocide), Burundi, Rwanda, the DRC, not to mention all the Hutus scattered throughout the world, where this regime sends death squads to hunt them from its embassies or from the contingents participating in the supposed UN peacekeeping missions.

Conclusion.

The apartheid practiced in South Africa has already been defeated de jure and has moved to Rwanda as a survival strategy. This apartheid, overseen by General Museveni of the NRA and controlled by the Western Elite and led by a group of Tutsis, is subtle because it does not make laws that openly discriminate.

On the contrary, it undermines the laws, highlighting unwritten instructions that come from leaders who came from Uganda and Burundi in 1994 to gradually restore the Tutsi monarchy and the Hima empire. The members of this group work in collusion with the Western elite, which gives them the means and the directives. This white elite that controls the country reminds us of the white minority that ruled South Africa and still dominates its economy.

But the apartheid practiced in Rwanda is worse because it hides in hypocrisy and the appearance of well-made laws to steal, slaughter, and kill. This apartheid far surpasses apartheid governed by written law, because this Tutsi apartheid of Rwanda is governed by barbarism, and it is worse than all the other systems that preceded it.

Let the whole world know this, rise up and fight to combat this perilous system. The survival of African states is at stake, because this Tutsi apartheid regime in Rwanda constitutes a real threat to all African states, just as before 1994 the apartheid government of South Africa constituted a real and potential threat to every African state.

posted by Mamadou Kouyate @ 7:12 PM