1) Judges' Behavior:
They act like they have nothing to do with niggas affairs! For them, it's just
inter/intra slavery fratricide quarrels. Let us therefore follow those who
agree to use our instruments at the expense of theirs to protect our economic
and geopolitical interests. We must then offer them everything they want,
regardless of how discriminatory their need for us is.
2) The Accusants:
There were no real witnesses The person we trusted, Tinga Tinga, entered court
and immediately revealed that the allegations had been prepared by the Rwandan
state and the Gauthiers.
3) The accusing witnesses:
Many of them claim to have witnessed Rwamucyo's acts of preparing and
organizing the Tutsis killings when they were very young, 7, 8, 9, or 11. It's
hard to believe that a child of that age could fully understand what was
happening at that time.
4) Defending witnesses who are also
civil parties in the trial: Most of the witnesses also state that
they are seeking compensation from Rwamucyo, meaning that two-thirds of the
so-called witnesses in the case are actual parties in the trial. This
translates to the fact that these are not testimonies in the true judicial
sense of the term, but the words of the accused against the words of the
defendant in the person of Dr. Rwamucyo Eugène.
5) Unverified witnesses:
Almost all witnesses to the accusation are new and unknown on the file. They
have not been questioned by the French investigators who went to Rwanda, the
prosecutor does not know them and are nowhere in the file submitted by the
judge to the Court of Assises. These are witnesses that the Gauthiers gathered
shortly before the trial began, which raises questions about the credibility of
the witness hearing procedure and the formation of civil parties.
6) Extraordinary proceedings of the
trial: This trial is based on testimony that seems invented,
prepared and often contradictory. However, these witnesses, both manipulated
and manipulative, share one thing in common: they are eloquent and skillfully
express deep sadness, using this technique to attract compassion and influence
the jurors' ignorance of the events that occurred in 1994 in Rwanda. Their
behavior in the courtroom, where they display tears and screams, raises
questions about how their grief and painful emotions immediately dissipate upon
leaving the courtroom.
It is time for all concerned and
concerned to stand up and fight against these dramatic and brutal cases so that
this injustice does not continue to be reaffirmed and consolidated. It is
imperative to put an end to these machiavellian maneuvers that transform
justice into an "infrastructure to legitimize racism, eradication and
discrimination perpetrated against the Hutus by the Western judicial
system."
Note:
This story is also available in French and in Kinyarwanda
No comments:
Post a Comment