Hungry for Truth, Peace and Justice

DR EUGENE RWAMUCYO'S TRIAL IS A DISGRACE FOR A COUNTRY THAT CLAIMS TO VALUE THE PRINCIPLES OF “EQUALITY, FREEDOM AND BROTHERHOOD".

1) Judges' Behavior: They act like they have nothing to do with niggas affairs! For them, it's just inter/intra slavery fratricide quarrels. Let us therefore follow those who agree to use our instruments at the expense of theirs to protect our economic and geopolitical interests. We must then offer them everything they want, regardless of how discriminatory their need for us is.

2) The Accusants: There were no real witnesses The person we trusted, Tinga Tinga, entered court and immediately revealed that the allegations had been prepared by the Rwandan state and the Gauthiers.

3) The accusing witnesses: Many of them claim to have witnessed Rwamucyo's acts of preparing and organizing the Tutsis killings when they were very young, 7, 8, 9, or 11. It's hard to believe that a child of that age could fully understand what was happening at that time.

4) Defending witnesses who are also civil parties in the trial: Most of the witnesses also state that they are seeking compensation from Rwamucyo, meaning that two-thirds of the so-called witnesses in the case are actual parties in the trial. This translates to the fact that these are not testimonies in the true judicial sense of the term, but the words of the accused against the words of the defendant in the person of Dr. Rwamucyo Eugène.

5) Unverified witnesses: Almost all witnesses to the accusation are new and unknown on the file. They have not been questioned by the French investigators who went to Rwanda, the prosecutor does not know them and are nowhere in the file submitted by the judge to the Court of Assises. These are witnesses that the Gauthiers gathered shortly before the trial began, which raises questions about the credibility of the witness hearing procedure and the formation of civil parties.

6) Extraordinary proceedings of the trial: This trial is based on testimony that seems invented, prepared and often contradictory. However, these witnesses, both manipulated and manipulative, share one thing in common: they are eloquent and skillfully express deep sadness, using this technique to attract compassion and influence the jurors' ignorance of the events that occurred in 1994 in Rwanda. Their behavior in the courtroom, where they display tears and screams, raises questions about how their grief and painful emotions immediately dissipate upon leaving the courtroom.

It is time for all concerned and concerned to stand up and fight against these dramatic and brutal cases so that this injustice does not continue to be reaffirmed and consolidated. It is imperative to put an end to these machiavellian maneuvers that transform justice into an "infrastructure to legitimize racism, eradication and discrimination perpetrated against the Hutus by the Western judicial system."

Note:
This story is also available in French and in Kinyarwanda

posted by Mamadou Kouyate @ 10:00 PM