Britain under pressure to end all aid to Rwandan government
Britain is under mounting international pressure to stop all aid to the Rwandan government.
By Jason Lewis, Investigations Editor, The Telegraph
06 Oct 2012
The United Nations and the European Union wants the UK
to withhold millions of pounds it is due to hand to President Paul Kagame's
government as part of an international campaign to choke his regime of funds.
Rwanda
is accused of arming rebels responsible for atrocities, including mass rape, in
the neighbouring Democrat Republic of Congo.
They hope that Britain
will fall in line after David Cameron replaced Andrew Mitchell as international
development secretary in his Cabinet reshuffle last month.
Britain
initially agreed to go along with international condemnation of Rwandan
involvement and to cancel £83 million it gives it in aid each year.
But Mr Mitchell's last act in the job, before he was moved
to the role of Chief Whip, had been to restore about £8m aid to the regime,
with another £8m to follow later this year, apparently against the advice of
officials in his department and from the Foreign Office.
-
08 Oct 2012
-
17 Oct 2012
-
05 Sep 2012
-
06 Oct 2012
-
30 Jul 2012
-
29 Jul 2012
He based the decision on personal assurances from the
Rwandan president and on his own experiences running a small Conservative
"charity" project in the country.
Officials were told his personal experience with Project
Umubano outweighed evidence from a group of experts from the UN, Human Rights
Watch observers and Foreign Office officials.
The Sunday Telegraph has learned that the UN and EU
privately expressed their "disappointment" with Mr Mitchell's
decision at a hastily convened international contact group meeting at the
Foreign Office last month.
A source at the meeting said there were "obvious
differences" between Foreign Office officials and "between different
officials in the Department for International Development".
Mr Mitchell apparently also ignored police intelligence
reports that suggest Rwandan dissidents living in exile in Britain
are being targeted by the regime.
Last year the Metropolitan Police took the unusual step of
issuing the Rwandan exiles with formal warning notices stating that "the
Rwandan government poses an imminent threat to your life".
The United Nations and Europe have
both accused President Kagame of giving support and weapons to the so-called 23
March Movement (known as M23) in the Democrat Republic of Congo, accusing it of
attacking civilians and "acts of sexual violence".
At a meeting at the UN in New York
last week the EU directly accused Rwanda
of backing the M23 rebels. President Kagame and senior figures in his regime
may now face sanctions over their links to the group and human rights abuses it
has carried out.
Two new confidential reports on Rwanda's
involvement with the M23 rebels were presented to Security Council officials
last week and are likely to lead to further action being taken against the
regime at the UN in the next few weeks.
A UN source said: "Britain's
position has come as a bit of a disappointment to those who are trying to alter
the position on the ground. Everyone else is united in putting pressure on Rwanda."
Britain
is Rwanda's
largest aid contributor and the source said its involvement in bring pressure
to bear on President Kagame was "vitally important".
Internal documents from DfID, released under the Freedlom of
Information Act, reveal that in a February 2011 telephone conversation, Mr
Mitchell had promised the Rwandan president that Britain
would increase its aid from £60m to £90m by 2015. Two months earlier, he had
flown to Rwanda
for a "90-minute tete-a-tete followed by lunch" with the newly
re-elected president.
But the memos also reveal doubts within the department about
the "political risk" in Rwanda.
Mr Mitchell's ministerial colleague, Stephen O'Brien, highlighted international
concern about human rights in Rwanda.
Justine Greening, the new International Development
Secretary, must now decide whether Rwanda
should receive the second tranche of the money promised by Mr Mitchell. Her
office did not respond to requests for comment.
A DFID spokesperson said: "The Secretary of State will
consider the issue of budget support to Rwanda
carefully before our next decision in December."
It is understood that Mr Mitchell based his decision to
continue aiding Rwanda
on "personal assurances" from Mr Kagame who had previously attended
the Conservative conference and lavished praise on Project Umubano calling it
an "unprecedented" example of aid. He is also understood to claim,
though, that the decision was later agreed by Downing Street.
The Conservatives' Rwanda
project was Mr Mitchell's personal brainchild but was designed to show the
caring side of Mr Cameron's Party when it was in opposition.
Now also working in Sierra Leone, the project has seen more
than 200 Tory supporters, including Mr Mitchell, his wife Sharon and their daughter
Rosie, fly to Rwanda for two-week stints to help as the country slowly recovers
from the genocide which saw an estimated 800,000 people murdered there in 1994.
Mrs Mitchell, a GP, has also spent several months working as
a doctor in Rwanda.
The Prime Minister praised the project as "the first
time that any British political party had engaged in a social action project in
the developing world".
He said he and Mr Mitchell had set it up "to raise
awareness of global poverty and play a small part in tackling it on the front
line".
Yesterday a Conservative spokeswoman said the project, which
includes an annual Tories versus locals cricket match, had "provided
English lessons to over 3,000 Rwandan primary school teachers, renovated a
school, established a small medical library and built a community centre".
Conservative volunteers, including ministers, MPs,
Parliamentary candidates and local councillors, pay their own airfares, but
much of the start up money for the project came from a wealthy widow from Hove,
Helena Frost.
Despite having little interest in politics, according to her
family, Mr Mitchell personally persuaded Mrs Frost to provide the funding.
Electoral Commission files show that before her death last November, she gave
the party £250,000 in donations - £200,000 of which went to fund Mr Mitchell's
office in opposition and £50,000 directly to the Rwanda
project.
Last night, Mrs Frost's nephew Mark, who was close to his
aunt and often accompanied her to charitable events, said he was "slightly
taken aback" that she gave so much.
He said: "It would appear Mr Mitchell (was) very
charming and very persuasive. It was quite a large sum which doesn't
necessarily seem to fit with the amounts she ordinarily gave to the many other
charities she supported.
"She was not one to meddle in politics at all and was
convinced the money was going to help the poor. She would have not have given
money to politicians for political use or gain, she had understood that she was
helping the poor in Rwanda."
He added: "This was a private matter and she was
reticent about this particular charitable donation.
"She was a wonderful woman who had a great passion for
certain causes and for many people. I can only imagine that this may have been
the case on this particular case for her to have contributed such large sums to
a single cause."
He said Mr Mitchell had been introduced to her through
another charity that he was involved with and to which Mrs Frost, who had a
considerable personal fortune and had also set up a £6 million charitable
foundation in the name of her late husband Patrick, had contributed large sums.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home