All of you who might still
doubt the unfairness and the lack of independence of the Rwandan justice system
with regard to the regime of Paul Kagame, open your eyes. Throughout the trial,
we tirelessly showed you how the High Court, by violating basic judicial
procedures and evidence of innocence presented by the defense, persisted in its
wanderings and declared itself competent to judge the facts all of which were
unsubstantiated and were contested by the defense, the facts that apparently
occurred before the law repressing them was enacted or the facts that have been
committed outside the jurisdiction of the High Court. Even the illegal
acquisition of the evidential documents from the Netherlands, which were
supposed to show the collaboration of Madame Victoire Ingabire with the armed
rebellion of Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), turned out
to be a windbag. The
Prosecution failed to provide, beyond any reasonable doubt, the evidence of
guilt for Madame Victoire Ingabire. By refusing to consider the testimonies and
breaches to the judicial procedure that were presented by the defense team, and
moreover, by violating the basic legal principles of non-retroactivity of
criminal laws and jurisdictions, the High Court failed to interpret the law and
therefore denied to Madame Victoire Ingabire the right to a fair trial.
While the Kigali regime wanted to transform the trial
of Madame Victoire Ingabire into banal act of criminal law, on several
occasions, it was caught in a flagrant meddling into judicial proceedings.
Indeed, the decision of April 16, 2012 by Madame Ingabire to withdraw from the
trial came in at the right moment, when in grave violation of basic judicial
procedures, one of the defense witnesses, Michel Habimana, had suffered
intimidations and illegal interrogations in prison, in the absence of his
lawyer, and without proper authorization from the Court. The next day, when the
witness returned to the Court, he reported the incident and informed the court
that his cell was searched from top to bottom. Therefore, Madame Victoire
Ingabire requested the Court the right to speak. In view of the extreme gravity
of the above reported incident and considering the facts as obviously prescient
of future obstructions to the expected testimonies from other witnesses in her
defense, and keeping in mind several irregularities accumulated throughout her
trial, Madame Victoire Ingabire told the Court that she had completely lost
confidence in Rwanda’s judiciary and that she was permanently withdrawing from
the trial. By doing so, she irrevocably proved that the Rwandan justice system was
broken and that it was under the total control of the executive.
The lawsuit against the Chairperson of FDU Inkingi is
politically motivated.
The allegations against the Chairperson of
FDU-Inkingi including, endangering the state security, divisionism, and
genocide denial, have been proven to be fixtures aimed at absolutely condemning
a disturbing political opponent. There is no longer any doubt: the lawsuit
initiated by the Kigali regime against Madame Victoire Ingabire is a highly
political trial. Madame Victoire Ingabire disturbs the Kigali regime because of
her strong commitment to reconciliation and justice for all victims and all
perpetrators; she distrurbs because of her resolute struggle against the
dictatorship of General Paul Kagame. By condemning an innocent person to such a
lengthy prison term solely on facts that exclusively relate to politics, the
Kigali regime intends to suppress any dissenting voice and thereby keep the
population in fear and submission under its totalitarian grip. At the same
time, the Kigali regime has sent a clear signal to national and international
public opinion that it certainly was not ready to open any political space and
engage in dialogue with its political opposition.
FDU Inkingi remains strongly committed to peaceful
struggle.
It is now clear for
FDU-Inkingi that the Kigali regime will never willingly open up the political
space. After two and a half years of unsuccessful application for the
registration of our party, it is now clear that President Paul Kagame will
never register FDU-Inkingi. By condemning to prison term Madame Victoire
Ingabire, who had returned home with the mandate of registering FDU-Inkingi and
standing in the presidential elections, the Rwandan regime has caused a major
political shift which must be condemned by all national and international
stakeholders including civil society and political activists that love peace
and are concerned about democratic change in Rwanda.
The Kigali regime has just
sentenced Madame Victoire Ingabire to prison term, but it will never reverse
what she has already accomplished and the hope she now embodies. The
Chairperson of FDU-Inkingi has built the path to emancipation which the Kigali
regime can no longer block, neither indefinitely nor with impunity.
Even though the political party FDU-Inkingi notes
once again the propensity of the Kigali regime to favor the use of force to
settle political disputes, we will not let ourselves be torn apart by such a
secret hope of the Rwandan regime which aimed at leading us into violence.
Violence will never be our political choice. Such a violent path would be
imposed upon us by the current regime in Kigali. While General Kagame has shown
in the past that he could tolerate any human cost to access or hold on power,
for FDU-Inkingi, human damages caused by the past tragedy in Rwanda are already
considerable enough so that we should all use caution not to add on new ones,
because if we did human consequences would be more immeasurable. The political
party FDU-Inkingi remains committed to negotiations and will continue to
request them, against all odds, to ensure a peaceful transition of our country
towards democracy and reconciliation. The party FDU-Inkingi hopes that General
Kagame would seize such an opportunity to accept, without any restrictions,
direct talks with his political opposition.
The choice is still up to President Paul Kagame.
We launch a solemn appeal to all of the Rwandan
people not to succumb to warmongering sirens which, owing to such an impasse
resulting from the closing of political space, may soon come forward and try to
lead us into the armed struggle in order to hold on or ascend to power. Such an
adventure which is meant to attract gullible customers, would serve in reality,
to legitimize the current regime instead of stirring up the real possibilities
for a genuine popular liberation.
It is still up to President
Paul Kagame. He may decide to remain on power through negotiations in which we
are asking his regime to engage with his political opposition. President Paul
Kagame may also decide to step down by force, a path that he would have himself
imposed upon us.
The
clock is ticking, Dr. Schweitzer!
Done in Lausanne, Switzerland, on October 30, 2012.
For
FDU-Inkingi Coordinating Committee
Dr. Nkiko Nsengimana
Coordinator
Dr. Nkiko Nsengimana
Coordinator
No comments:
Post a Comment