By A.M.I.
Democracy Human Rights Group
November 21, 2009
I have recently and regularly read the following quoting from an article published in the Washington Post on November 22, 2009 by the American writer Stephen Kinzer: "In his memoir, "God Sleeps in Rwanda" Joseph Sebarenzi presents a thoughtful critique of Kagame's regime. His tale is a provocative warning to the many outsiders who are ready to canonize Kagame". In fact it is also a provocative warning to Stephen Kinzer himself, who has already canonized Kagame.
Let me remind you that the same American writer Stephen Kinzer recently published the book: "A Thousand Hills: Rwanda's Rebirth and the Man Who Dreamed It."
This Kagame canonizing book has been written in the typical "Blancs Menteurs" or parrot's tradition, which precisely canonizes Kagame, refusing to have any honest consideration for the Rwandese and Congolese victims of Kagame and his RPF dictatorial regime. A parrot is a tropical bird with hooked beak and fleshy tongue who repeats words without understanding their meaning (Penguin English Dictionary, op cit., p.513).
Let us further read and comment some of Stephen Kinzer’s statements:
1) "By all accounts, the credit goes to President Paul Kagame, whose rebel army, the Rwandan Patriotic Front, deposed the genocidal regime in 1994 and who has been the country's strongman ever since".
Comment: This is not the truth, because there are more and more accounts discrediting Kagame for: having perpetrated a terrorist coup d'Etat on April the 6th , 1994, for having killed two democratically elected African presidents (Rwanda and Burundi), having deliberately sacrificed the intramural Tutsis, having murdered hundreds of thousands of Hutus in both the Northern and Eastern parts of Rwanda at least during the period spanning from 1990-1994, having killed hundreds of thousands of Hutu refugees in the forests of Zaire/RDC since November 1996, being responsible of both direct and indirect death of millions of innocent Congolese citizens in both South and North Kivu in order to transform these regions in a no man's land to further be colonized by RPF…
2) "Kagame is one of the world's most intriguing leaders".
Comment: Kagame, an intriguing leader? What does the verb "intrigue" mean? In the classical Penguin English Dictionary (G.N. Garmonsway, 2nd edition, 1969, p.395) we read: "plot secretly, make sly schemes, have a secret love affair, rouse the curiosity of, fascinate, puzzle, mystify". Of course, Kagame plotted secretly, on the sly, and his secret sly schemes have been secretly dissimulated and covered up by his New World Order's bosses. Of course, Kagame rouses the morbid and fascinating curiosity of many uninformed persons because a broad network of Kagame’s lovers systematically conceals, disguises, and camouflages the truth about the Rwandan tragedy. I it the way Kagame has a secret love affair?
3."Fearing for his life, Sebarenzi fled the country for a second time".
Comment: Of course, Sebarenzi, who formerly fled to Zaïre/D.R.C., has been warned by close friends and insiders of the RPF regime that Kagame would literally bump him off!
4. “Kagame is likely to have only token opposition and may win with something like the 95 percent margin he claimed in 2003”.
Comment: Everybody will agree not to disagree with me if I ask the following question: "For Rwanda's dictator, would it be so difficult not to win?"
Let me give some examples. All of the political parties wear the RPF’s hat. All of the real political opponents of Kagame live outside of Rwanda by fear to be killed or to be charged during the heretical Gacaca trials, the goal of which is to make an under-society of pauperized Hutu slaves, accused of being "genocide mentality and genetically affected" revisionists, negationists, divisionists and justificationists, such an underworld surviving under the orders of a minority of newly wealthy Tutsi extremists. All of the socialist villages are supervised by the Local Defense Forces (L.D.F.). Both the Kigali-City region and the Eastern part of Rwanda de facto became a Tutsiland, but where are the former Hutu inhabitants between both the Muvumba, Akagera, and Akanyaru rivers? Of course, the "democratic" Kagame obtained and will obtain circa 95%, like former Zaïrian President Mobutu Sese Seko N'kuku Ngbendu wa za Banga, Saddam Hussein, Pol Pot, Douglashvilli Staline or the mythical King Ubu.
5."Sebarenzi writes. "He also may well be afraid of the outcome of a classical democracy in a majority-minority divided society, which might well translate into a demographic election in which Hutu would overwhelmingly win".
Comment: Of course since the preparation of the broad scale offensive from their strongholds in Uganda, RANU/RPF/RPA leaders made a socio-cultural analysis of the political issues in Rwanda, in term of ethnical solidarity, ethnos or predominant characteristics of the cultural communities of Rwanda, and demographic statistics. The majority of the Rwandan people meaning the Hutu (circa 85%) ubwoko (tribe, ethnos), and the democracy meaning a "one man, one vote" scheme, it was impossible for the RPF to get a regularly majority vote and to access to power without taking this power by brutal, terrorist, and military means. Of course, one of the practical tactics necessarily to achieve this strategy of power control consisted in reducing the intramural population, both Hutu and the so-called "class five" Tutsi, in order to, first of all, make place in the country, and secondarily in the neighbouring Zaïre/D.R.C., for a further re-colonization by the RPF supporters. I would define Kagame's strategy as the "*Kagame Cuckoo Strategy*", because there is no difference between the "RPF strategy" and the "*Cuckoo strategy*", the migratory cuckoo in the nest of a bird being a harmful intruder, like the Tutsi diaspora and Kagame's RPF in Rwanda. The democratic power in Kagame's mind means RPF dictatorship reigning on a blameworthy accused majority of Hutu slaves.
6. "Whether he can do so may determine the long-term success of Rwanda's audacious experiment".
Comment: This is a terrific sentence. What does an "audacious experiment" for Rwanda mean? First of all, the word "audacious" means: "daring, intrepid, presumptuous, and impudent" (Penguin English Dictionary, op cit., p.42). Secondly, the word "experiment" means: "test or observation for scientific purposes, under conditions controlled by the experimenter", "test, attempt to verify theory or discover new facts" and "investigation by trial and error" (Penguin English Dictionary, op cit., p.265). Therefore, we could logically define Kagame as an audacious, intrepid, daring, presumptuous and impudent experimenter who controlled the conditions of his experiment, alternatively by trial and error. Furthermore, everybody knowing that all the experiments are closely planed, we are allowed to raise the question for an enquiry about the criminals responsible for the planning of both the civilian war and the broad scale genocide in both Rwanda and Zaïre/D.R.C. In Arusha, Tanzania, the ICTR judges recently and iteratively issued a ruling that "there is no proof that the genocide has been planned by the Rwandan government’s side". Logically, the genocide has thus been planned by the other warring side. That is the RPF and its boss, Paul Kagame.
Conclusion
I would say that Stephen Kinzer, as a writer and/or journalist, is a good example of a weather vane or a weather cock, changing his mind depending on which way the wind is blowing, and almost passing the hat round when there is a hope of good return. He wrote his last above mentioned book praising the beloved dictator Kagame to the skies, and as by magic, he now smells that things could flare up if everybody understands the real roots of the "*Kagame Cuckoo Strategy*" in the ancestral Rwanda where milk and honey flowed like the four rivers encircling Havilah in the Eden Garden.
But Kagame is not eternal like the "Eternal Flame" on John Fitzgerald Kennedy's tomb, in the National Arlington Cemetery, West of the Potomac River in Washington. Kagame came from his Mulindi headquarters, crossing the Mulindi River for capturing Kigali and Rwanda. Mulindi, like Potomac, prefigure the Acheron or the Styx rivers, leading to Hadès or Infernus.
I wouldn’t like to be in his shoes, in his size 53 shoes, when, once upon a time, somewhere in the world, a judge will grab him by the scuff of his neck for war crimes, crimes against humanity, criminal conspiracy, economical crimes and genocide, not a particular genocide against one African tribe, but a genocide against humanity!
Of course, father of both Ugandan and Rwandan departments of military intelligence (DMI), President Paul Kagame is an intelligent man, capable of reasoning, but that does not mean that he's a cleaver person. He knows that his apocalyptic cavalcade in Central African Great Lakes countries leads him to a "no out let road". He took along with him too many innocent people and that has to be stopped now. The sole hope for the humanity, is that Kagame definitively understands that his soul is in danger of eternal death, that he recognizes his crimes, and that he asks forgiveness to the martyrized Rwandan people, so that the "Kagame's Cuckoo Strategy" will end with the Cuckoo’s Takeoff.
Related Materials:
Book Review: God Sleeps in Rwanda: A Journey of Transformation
Defense lawyers excited after six Genocide acquittals
ICTR-ADAD Welcomes Acquittal of Fr. Hormisdas Nsengimana on Charges of Genocide and “Genocide Planning”
ICTR: Rwanda Genocide Ruling Overturned
Rwanda: No Conspiracy, No Genocide Planning ... No Genocide?
Rwanda: Conspiracy to Commit Genocide, Important Missing Puzzle Piece
More Missing Puzzle Pieces for Inquiring Minds or Possibly Trolls
Rwanda: Paul Kagame Sacrificed The Tutsis
Rwanda: Paul Kagame’s War Crimes, Crimes against Humanity, and Crimes of Genocide
Dear friend A.M.I,
ReplyDeleteAlthough from the French root "intrigue" and Italian's "intricare", intriguing actually means " interesting, fascinating, absorbing, compelling, gripping, riveting, captivating, engaging, enthralling, enchanting, attractive, appealing." We, Americans, blame the French and the Italians for the confusion.
At the UN Security Council in 1994, it is rumored that the French said in their French accent "Kagame is euh... un intrigant... guing". So The British and the Americans, always believing that French knew Rwandans better than them, agreed by saying: "Yes, Yes we agree. Kagame is really intriguing. He deserves all the support he needs." The fate of the Rwandan Hutu and Tutsi was sealed. Because of the confusion about the word, Kagame was given the green light to massacre 3 millions Rwandese and 5 millions Congolese, and to be decorated by Rick Warren and Tony Blair for that intriguing religious and political act.
As for me, I do not see anything intriguing about Kagame and his brothers. I heard one of his brothers, shot by angry bats in a broad daylight on the streets of Uganda 15 years or so ago, was equally a hideous monster. It is a good pedigree of genetically modified repulsive fiends (not friends, please but fiends).
Kagame, being the champion of underhanded plans, is rather an intriguer, a schemer, which in French, if I am not mistaken, means "intrigant."
The enlightened Rick Warren cannot make a saint out of a monster; Tony Blair cannot make a democrat out of a bloodthirsty tyrant. By contrast, bats (chauve-souris) are usually intriguing creatures: they captive our imagination and can easily spot a monster and a bloodthirsty tyrant in the heat of the night.
David.
I would like to ask those people that say RPF deposed a genocidal regime in 1994; how comes they negotiated with it and a power sharing agreement was in place not forgeting an entire RPA Battalion in Kigali?
ReplyDelete