By Ignatius Ssuuna
The New Times
June 5, 2009
Kigali — The decision by the Trial and Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) to reject the transfer of cases to Kigali dilutes the government's effort to end the culture of impunity.
Addressing the UN Security Council in New York yesterday, Prosecutor General Martin Ngoga said the decision was a setback to the progress registered by the country in repairing the shattered national fabric not only in the justice sector but in all aspects of national reconciliation and reconstruction.
"The decisions taken by the Trial and Appeals Chamber have severely undermined my government's ability to pursue and bring to justice those suspected of Genocide all over the world," Ngoga said.
The ICTR, which was instituted to try masterminds of the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi, last year turned down the request by the tribunal's prosecutor to transfer five cases to Rwanda as part of the completion mechanism of the backlogged UN court.
Ngoga however said Rwanda remains committed to support the ICTR, which is set to close in 2010.
He told the Council that the government will continue to facilitate the court with access to witnesses for both the defence and the prosecution and assist the movement of witnesses to and from Arusha.
"We have continued to ensure the security of witnesses and respond to any issues that have arisen on a case by case basis," Ngoga explained.
He said the government had also continued to support investigations initiated by both the Prosecution and the Defence without prejudice to either.
He revealed that the government had undertaken a review and proposed amendments to the law governing the transfer of cases, the law abolishing the death penalty and had established a Witness Protection Unit within the Judiciary.
"These reforms are resolutely based on my government's perspectives on the ICTR's completion strategy and specifically the transfer of cases rather than the maintenance of the status quo."
He said the decision to reject the transfer was based on incorrect assessments and occasionally, deliberate misrepresentations by human rights organisations like Human Rights Watch.
The denial for referral of these cases was based on claims by Human Rights Watch that Rwandan judiciary was 'not yet prepared' to handle the cases. He said the government remains confident that this situation will be reversed.
Related Materials:
Rwanda: Academic Scholars Call for ICTR to Fulfill Mandate and Prosecute RPF/RPA Members
Rwanda: Tribunal Risks Supporting ‘Victor’s Justice’
Cooperation from States critical as UN tribunals enter final phase, say officials
UN: Speakers in Security Council call for rapid completion of cases before tribunals, while stressing need for mechanisms to tackle residual tasks
PRESS CONFERENCE BY PROSECUTORS FOR INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNALS FOR FORMER YUGOSLAVIA, RWANDA
Letter to the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Regarding the Prosecution of RPF Crimes
UN: Highlight Rights and Justice on Africa Trip
Yesterday a victim, today an oppressor: how aid funds war in Congo
The Power of Horror in Rwanda
The genocide in Rwanda: The difficulty of trying to stop it happening ever again
The Two Faces of Rwanda
No comments:
Post a Comment